Do you love science but are unhappy with the culture in academia?
Editor’s note: This post was originally published on LinkedIn and has been reposted here with permission. Minor edits have been made with the author's approval.
Do you love science but are unhappy with the culture in academia?
As a PhD student, postdoc or lab leader (PI), do you feel like your mental health may be suffering because of problems in the system?
Do you think your lab could be managed more efficiently?
After around 12 years of working in academia in the UK, Germany, Turkey, Belgium, USA and Canada, I have been exposed to a diverse spectrum of cultures across different labs. One of the most striking things I have seen in common across most labs is the style (or lack thereof) of leadership and management of people and projects.
What happened to management and leadership training in academia?
When I began to look beyond academia and into the culture of business in the commercial sector, I was truly shocked at how stark the contrast is. To be employed as any kind of manager in the commercial world, training of management and leadership related skills is the norm, but in academia, this is a rarity. Unfortunately, this not only affects the doctoral students and postdoctoral researchers, but also their supervisors. Due to poor access to resources, supervisors are unable to give more attention to training, they also underestimate the value of these skills, and lack time due to institutional pressures.
The actual training part of a PhD or postdoc position is often sadly forgotten
Are doctoral students and postdocs really in training?
The actual training part of a PhD or postdoc position is often sadly forgotten. This ends up being at the expense of the trainee, the supervisor, the institution and society as a whole as the majority of PhD students graduate with a critical lack of soft skills required for career progression, academic or not.
A survey of 50,000 graduate students showed that 86% reported levels of anxiety
Mind the gap
The issue of mental health in academia has been gaining more attention, particularly for students. A recent survey of 50,000 graduate students in the UK showed that 86% reported significant levels of anxiety. In addition, there have been multiple recent reports of bullying, harassment and exploitation, not only from scientific staff, but also scientific support staff.
There is no shortage of media out there highlighting problems in the culture of academia. It is undeniable that the poor mental health of doctoral students and postdoctoral researchers and numerous cases of bad supervision are not unrelated. Moreover, all faculty members were also once doctoral students and postdoctoral researchers, so it would follow that mental health issues are also rife at higher levels.
Filling the gap
As a result of the increased discussion of these problems, there has been a growth of initiatives aiming to improve the training experience and mental health of doctoral students and postdoctoral researchers. A couple of examples include the N2 network of Doctoral Researchers in Germany, which consists of the Max Planck PhDnet, Helmholtz Juniors and Leibniz PhD Network. The N2 Network is active at the political level and has explicitly expressed its goals in political and constitutional letters, and a position paper addressing power abuse and conflict resolution. Another organization tackling some of these issues is the German Scholars Organization, offering career support, leadership training and a broad network of peers in academia.
An alarming 0.45% of people with PhDs go on to become professors
Nowhere to go
Doctoral students and postdoctoral researchers often find themselves believing that their only career option is a traditional academic path, partly due to a lack of career-related resources, but also largely due to the culture embedded in academia. However, we now know that an alarming 0.45% of people with PhDs in the UK go on to become professors. With these kinds of prospects, it is no wonder doctoral students’ and postdoctoral researchers’ mental health is in crisis. A recalibration of resources is clearly needed to allow for PhD graduates to shift their perspectives and expectations, to accept that tenure is actually the “alternative path”, and to know there are indeed countless other feasible career options out there. On a positive note, a report by the World Economic Forum indicated that the skills most sought after by employers will include problem solving, creative thinking, emotional intelligence and interpersonal skills by 2020, all of which are thoroughly developed during a PhD.
So, what’s the purpose of this article?
This article is the first in a series that will dive deeper into the issues mentioned here, and will provide an information resource for doctoral students and postdoctoral researchers and supervisors. The intentions are not only to raise awareness, but also to identify feasible, tangible and actionable solutions.
What to expect from these articles in the future
Future articles will provide:
- A review of relevant recent articles, developments, initiatives, etc.
- First-hand insights into the culture of academia
- Discussions of problems and solutions
- Resources for improving the training experiences of doctoral students and postdoctoral researchers, and for improving the supervision experience of supervisors
Please add comments below about your own experiences, about resources, networks or groups you know about, or about your thoughts and ideas for tackling these problems. Another way to contribute would be to take part in this survey that is designed to explore the aspects of researchers’ life bring them joy and fulfilment versus those that cause them stress and anxiety.
Comments
You're looking to give wings to your academic career and publication journey. We like that!
Why don't we give you complete access! Create a free account and get unlimited access to all resources & a vibrant researcher community.
